.. Copyright 1988-2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is part of the GCC manual. For copying conditions, see the copyright.rst file. .. index:: condition code status .. _condition-code: Condition Code Status ********************* Condition codes in GCC are represented as registers, which provides better schedulability for architectures that do have a condition code register, but on which most instructions do not affect it. The latter category includes most RISC machines. Implicit clobbering would pose a strong restriction on the placement of the definition and use of the condition code. In the past the definition and use were always adjacent. However, recent changes to support trapping arithmetic may result in the definition and user being in different blocks. Thus, there may be a ``NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK`` between them. Additionally, the definition may be the source of exception handling edges. These restrictions can prevent important optimizations on some machines. For example, on the IBM RS/6000, there is a delay for taken branches unless the condition code register is set three instructions earlier than the conditional branch. The instruction scheduler cannot perform this optimization if it is not permitted to separate the definition and use of the condition code register. If there is a specific condition code register in the machine, use a hard register. If the condition code or comparison result can be placed in any general register, or if there are multiple condition registers, use a pseudo register. Registers used to store the condition code value will usually have a mode that is in class ``MODE_CC``. Alternatively, you can use ``BImode`` if the comparison operator is specified already in the compare instruction. In this case, you are not interested in most macros in this section. .. toctree:: :maxdepth: 2 .. index:: CCmode, MODE_CC .. _mode_cc-condition-codes: Representation of condition codes using registers ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ .. c:macro:: SELECT_CC_MODE (op, x, y) On many machines, the condition code may be produced by other instructions than compares, for example the branch can use directly the condition code set by a subtract instruction. However, on some machines when the condition code is set this way some bits (such as the overflow bit) are not set in the same way as a test instruction, so that a different branch instruction must be used for some conditional branches. When this happens, use the machine mode of the condition code register to record different formats of the condition code register. Modes can also be used to record which compare instruction (e.g. a signed or an unsigned comparison) produced the condition codes. If other modes than ``CCmode`` are required, add them to :samp:`{machine}-modes.def` and define ``SELECT_CC_MODE`` to choose a mode given an operand of a compare. This is needed because the modes have to be chosen not only during RTL generation but also, for example, by instruction combination. The result of ``SELECT_CC_MODE`` should be consistent with the mode used in the patterns; for example to support the case of the add on the SPARC discussed above, we have the pattern .. code-block:: c++ (define_insn "" [(set (reg:CCNZ 0) (compare:CCNZ (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "%r") (match_operand:SI 1 "arith_operand" "rI")) (const_int 0)))] "" "...") together with a ``SELECT_CC_MODE`` that returns ``CCNZmode`` for comparisons whose argument is a ``plus`` : .. code-block:: c++ #define SELECT_CC_MODE(OP,X,Y) \ (GET_MODE_CLASS (GET_MODE (X)) == MODE_FLOAT \ ? ((OP == LT || OP == LE || OP == GT || OP == GE) \ ? CCFPEmode : CCFPmode) \ : ((GET_CODE (X) == PLUS || GET_CODE (X) == MINUS \ || GET_CODE (X) == NEG || GET_CODE (x) == ASHIFT) \ ? CCNZmode : CCmode)) Another reason to use modes is to retain information on which operands were used by the comparison; see ``REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE`` later in this section. You should define this macro if and only if you define extra CC modes in :samp:`{machine}-modes.def`. .. function:: void TARGET_CANONICALIZE_COMPARISON (int *code, rtx *op0, rtx *op1, bool op0_preserve_value) .. hook-start:TARGET_CANONICALIZE_COMPARISON On some machines not all possible comparisons are defined, but you can convert an invalid comparison into a valid one. For example, the Alpha does not have a ``GT`` comparison, but you can use an ``LT`` comparison instead and swap the order of the operands. On such machines, implement this hook to do any required conversions. :samp:`{code}` is the initial comparison code and :samp:`{op0}` and :samp:`{op1}` are the left and right operands of the comparison, respectively. If :samp:`{op0_preserve_value}` is ``true`` the implementation is not allowed to change the value of :samp:`{op0}` since the value might be used in RTXs which aren't comparisons. E.g. the implementation is not allowed to swap operands in that case. GCC will not assume that the comparison resulting from this macro is valid but will see if the resulting insn matches a pattern in the :samp:`md` file. You need not to implement this hook if it would never change the comparison code or operands. .. hook-end .. c:macro:: REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE (mode) A C expression whose value is one if it is always safe to reverse a comparison whose mode is :samp:`{mode}`. If ``SELECT_CC_MODE`` can ever return :samp:`{mode}` for a floating-point inequality comparison, then ``REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE (mode)`` must be zero. You need not define this macro if it would always returns zero or if the floating-point format is anything other than ``IEEE_FLOAT_FORMAT``. For example, here is the definition used on the SPARC, where floating-point inequality comparisons are given either ``CCFPEmode`` or ``CCFPmode`` : .. code-block:: c++ #define REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE(MODE) \ ((MODE) != CCFPEmode && (MODE) != CCFPmode) .. c:macro:: REVERSE_CONDITION (code, mode) A C expression whose value is reversed condition code of the :samp:`{code}` for comparison done in CC_MODE :samp:`{mode}`. The macro is used only in case ``REVERSIBLE_CC_MODE (mode)`` is nonzero. Define this macro in case machine has some non-standard way how to reverse certain conditionals. For instance in case all floating point conditions are non-trapping, compiler may freely convert unordered compares to ordered ones. Then definition may look like: .. code-block:: c++ #define REVERSE_CONDITION(CODE, MODE) \ ((MODE) != CCFPmode ? reverse_condition (CODE) \ : reverse_condition_maybe_unordered (CODE)) .. function:: bool TARGET_FIXED_CONDITION_CODE_REGS (unsigned int *p1, unsigned int *p2) .. hook-start:TARGET_FIXED_CONDITION_CODE_REGS On targets which use a hard register rather than a pseudo-register to hold condition codes, the regular CSE passes are often not able to identify cases in which the hard register is set to a common value. Use this hook to enable a small pass which optimizes such cases. This hook should return true to enable this pass, and it should set the integers to which its arguments point to the hard register numbers used for condition codes. When there is only one such register, as is true on most systems, the integer pointed to by :samp:`{p2}` should be set to ``INVALID_REGNUM``. The default version of this hook returns false. .. hook-end .. function:: machine_mode TARGET_CC_MODES_COMPATIBLE (machine_mode m1, machine_mode m2) .. hook-start:TARGET_CC_MODES_COMPATIBLE On targets which use multiple condition code modes in class ``MODE_CC``, it is sometimes the case that a comparison can be validly done in more than one mode. On such a system, define this target hook to take two mode arguments and to return a mode in which both comparisons may be validly done. If there is no such mode, return ``VOIDmode``. The default version of this hook checks whether the modes are the same. If they are, it returns that mode. If they are different, it returns ``VOIDmode``. .. hook-end .. c:var:: unsigned int TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM .. hook-start:TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM If the target has a dedicated flags register, and it needs to use the post-reload comparison elimination pass, or the delay slot filler pass, then this value should be set appropriately. .. hook-end